The atomization of the system devised by General Choi Hong Hi has led to a remarkable diversity of criteria and information. Many of these expressions are based on uncertain, arbitrary foundations and are difficult to identify with the theory and practice proposed by the founder of the discipline.

At times, one hears complex explanations about the theory behind increasing power in techniques that verge on the delusional from a physics standpoint—explanations of biomechanics and the sine wave that would astonish any scientist.

As a direct student of General Choi and his Spanish translator for over 10 instructor seminars and for his Encyclopedia, I have never seen or heard such complex explanations from the founder himself, nor has he included them in his encyclopedia. This brings to mind the old saying: “some are more papist than the Pope.” Based on this, the current technical and biomechanical diversity becomes understandable. However, the outcomes of these interpretations must be seriously considered. The rigidity resulting from following them is a constant that renders movements impractical, as the muscle contractions these techniques demand occur in inappropriate areas of the body.

The excessive sport-oriented approach has stripped movements of their intention, turning forms (tul) into mere geometric executions, devoid of purpose. Those who have arbitrarily and absurdly imposed the lack of definition in hook heel-turning kicks (bandae dollyo gorochagi) in the Juche and Moon Moo patterns have yet to reconcile this erroneous and crude modification with the correct execution, which has been clearly shown in various videos by General Choi himself—explaining and demonstrating how they should be properly performed.

From a didactic standpoint, there’s now a trend of teaching courses, master classes, and seminars where the instructor lacks a pedagogical approach rooted in what Choi Hong Hi developed. Instead, they focus on showcasing their personal skills in warm-up drills or combinations used in sports techniques.

If we were to judge past classes, courses, and seminars through the lens of these modern pedagogical practices—ones often marked by an undeniable desire to demonstrate superiority over the average participant—then all of them, including those of the founder himself, would be deemed outdated and passé.

I would like to offer a reflection: if the goal is to hold a technical seminar, its true value lies in the effectiveness of the execution and in confirming the students’ understanding and application. One must clearly distinguish between a seminar conductor and someone simply showing off their performance acquired in occasional competitions or demonstrations.

Conclusion: The former must master both the art and its pedagogy (to teach), while the latter merely displays their abilities (to show off)—which, nowadays, are no longer surprising, since social media regularly features highly skilled performers, even at lower ranks.

SGM Ricardo Desimone   

To be aware read again the previous notes    

When questions are asked about Taekwon-Do, the answer is invariably that it is a martial art that can be practiced by everyone regardless of age.

This is only a half-truth, as certain conditions must be considered for this statement to be more than just a form of advertising. In the case of children, when asked, the Founder of the discipline responded that 8 years old was a good age to begin. Of course, that response implicitly assumed an understanding of the basic theory that supports the practice of Taekwon-Do — and before that age, it is practically impossible to transfer that understanding. Nowadays, that age has been done away with by the system that also calls itself Taekwon-Do, but which allows children as young as 3 or 4 to practice. Sure, the name is Taekwon-Do, but what is practiced there has nothing to do with what was founded by Choi Hong Hi — except for the greeting, the uniform, and the name of the activity.

However, it must be acknowledged that, without a doubt, it is a very useful way to instill a form of discipline in children within a society that, generally speaking, shows signs of the opposite.

In the case of adults, something similar happens, as what is often taught is a variety of movements with a sporting application, suited exclusively for people of both sexes but only within the age range of 14 to 40. All those beyond that age — with honorable exceptions — make great efforts to repeat the dictated movements without the possibility of truly incorporating them into their combat repertoire. The reasons are simply due to age, although no one mentions it outright. That is why I always speak with caution about those who deliver massive seminars on sports techniques without taking into account the age or physical structure of the participants.

Does this mean that there are multiple Taekwon-Dos within Taekwon-Do? The Founder developed a single art, not two. Nevertheless, as instructors, we must take the aforementioned details into account. It is well known that only 20 to 30% of students may become interested in the sporting facet; the rest simply follow the given instructions.

Martial art and self-defense are intimately linked — both conceptually and in terms of the techniques to be executed — which is why it is said that Taekwon-Do is a martial art with a sporting aspect, not the other way around.

Those who have practiced one or another technique for escaping holds or defending against armed attacks have likely realized that if these are not practiced regularly, they have no practical application. The lack of repetition with opponents of different sizes prevents them from working as they should. In tests for advanced ranks, when asked to deal with such attacks, it often becomes clear how ineffective the practitioners are due to a lack of training in that area.

In the sporting realm, there have always been trendy techniques — movements effectively executed by a few skilled competitors. Immediately afterward, the other competitors and instructors present try to incorporate those techniques into their classes without considering the underlying details that make such executions effective. The age of the performer is a fundamental factor to consider when trying to imitate them. The problem arises when one tries to execute them with an unsuitable body or at an inappropriate age.

I believe the best way to get the most out of the art of Taekwon-Do is to recognize within oneself what goals we want to achieve — always bearing in mind our personal limitations.

SGM Ricardo Desimone

to be aware read the previous notes

We can talk until tiredness about the biomechanics of Taekwon-Do movements. These are just a variety of tools that we can use for self-defense.  The practical usefulness of each of them is closely linked to the circumstances we have to face. For this reason, the vast majority will be of practical use in situations that cannot be reproduced in sports because they have been designed to solve situations with several opponents.

Normally, the confrontation with a single opponent is trained, as the only one possible to be included in the sport field. The pedagogical aspect and its methodology have a central influence for success in this area.

Usually in the teaching of art, students are compelled to execute this type of fight from the very beginning of the practice; I mean that due to an erroneous pedagogy a beginner is required to perform this type of confrontation without an adequate handling of his body for such a commitment.

The beginner is compelled to acquire his experience on the trial and effect of his own blunders. They had not time enough to acquire a better control of the necessary tools.

He is encouraged to execute foot works that include reverse turning kicks and jumps when he is still clumsy for direct linear movements.  The reason for this error has a name: tournament.

The «need» of the instructor to take as many students as possible to a sporting event has determined this pedagogical mistake.  To illustrate the enormous difference between the bodily employment of an advanced belt and what is done by beginner ranks can be clearly seen in competitions. Not only do they badly hit each other, but they also show the lack of effectiveness in what they do.

Free combat against a single opponent, which is what is taught and executed in daily training, would be used to develop, among other things, tactics and strategy in this type of circumstance. However, the beginner student is forced to not be able to develop them because he doesn’t manage his tools appropriately.

In sport combat, just 6 or 7 techniques out of the almost 3200 existing are used in the best of cases and in hands of a highly skilled person. The regulations, the prohibitions and the type of opponents make it so. The application of these will also depend on time and distance to be successfully executed.

If the student does not yet have mastery of his tools to be able to use them when the occasion demands it, the evolution of his tactics and strategy will be significantly affected.

The solution would be very simple to implement, but unfortunately it will depend on the «need» of the instructor to take his beginner students to a tournament. He must understand, among other things, that if his novice students win, the students of other instructors will not run to enroll in his class.

It should also be clear that if a low-ranking competitor has been a winner in a sporting event, they do not have the development or experience to compete with the more advanced ones, just won in that competition with the occasional opponents of his rank.

The student has always been told that he should not practice a more advanced pattern (tul) until he has mastered the one at his level. This truth is a dictum of the founder of the art himself written in his literature; however this criterion is not applied to the training of sport combat. If the student had not the necessary time to develop the tools, he or she is built on poor foundations, with great ambition but at the wrong time.

SGM Ricardo Desimone

To speak about the damage that the institutional atomization of Taekwon-Do has produced would be a reiterative truth. In a note published on Facebook with an authorship that I can’t remember, the number of entities using the same acronym and claiming to teach General Choi’s Taekwon-Do was described in detail.

The figure illustrates 48 and included the name and rank of those who preside over them. In the list were included ITO, an international organization that I founded in 2013 and I’m currently chair. Although ITO doesn’t exploit the acronym that is used by the remaining 47, it does strictly teach what the Founder of the discipline bequeathed to me because I’ve received it directly from his hands without any intermediary. Details on this can be obtained at www.itotkd.org

I knew that there were many entities that claim to teach what the General dictated, but I didn’t imagine that would be so many and in this same context those that are to come. They all claim to do it but none of them follow his teachings.

I mean being the federation that Choi Hong Hi presided over. The reasons are obvious and have been explained repeatedly. Beyond the biomechanical divergence in relation to the original, the problem begins to worsen due to the number of entities that dispute the management of the students in his name, the promotion system, times applied between ranks and costs of them. Some reminders are necessary to reason about the seriousness that besets us and understand what we call the legacy of General Choi Hong Hi:

1. a) It is necessary TO USE THE SYSTEM developed by the Founder. This must be done in all its aspects and not only in any of them and because it is convenient so. The pedagogical methodology must not be altered (warm-up system, body biomechanics, philosophy, uniform to be used, the time and training required in the scale of degrees to be granted, protocols to be followed and the sports system to be used).
2. b) Nobody can compulsorily occupy the place of the Founder without the consent and support of the rest; therefore, they are only regents of private companies.
3. c) Art should not depend on any country or regime because that is how it was designated by General Choi himself, repeatedly said in countless seminars and reports that have been made on him. This was also written down in his bibliography and in his memoirs.
4. d) Fortunately, there are still high-ranking people who, as it is in my case, we have been his direct students and can attest to this truth.
5. e) Many reports that were made on him have been recorded and filmed and serve to endorse what has been said.
6. f) The General boasted of the existence of a single entity that contained his unique art, with a unique biomechanics and a unique pedagogical system to transfer knowledge to the next generations of practitioners. Business ambitions and lack of awareness have done the opposite.

The number of world, continental, national, regional, and even neighborhood tournaments is overwhelming, however, and due to institutional diversity, the successes achieved in them only count for the entity that sponsors each event.

In front of an ephemeral possibility of a merger with Olympic Taekwondo, it is necessary to keep in mind that none of the aforementioned 48 has preeminence over the rest, in the event of an alleged and more than unlikely negotiation.

Institutional unity is the only possible way to preserve the legacy and give coherence to the current sale of ranks.

A single entity is the only possible means of regulating activity. The old popular saying of unity is forced to go around shouting, but apparently, no one hears it or, what is worse, it seems that no one wants to hear it, because of that «there is no worse deaf than the one who doesn’t want to hear».

SGM Ricardo Desimone

To be aware read again the previous notes

There has always been the empty pattern, the one executed by a large number of practitioners searching a stylistic perfection very difficult to use in actual self defense.  A number of factors are involved in a pattern’s developing that in rare occasions are taken into account.

In Taekwon-Do, General Choi, its undisputed founder and developer, included countless details in designing the 24 patterns that support his art. Symbolism and chronology illustrates significant dates of ancestral Korea and the persons who fed its history. The amount of movements and the diagram are significant details related with these actors. . Beyond this admirable historical summary, however, lies the method of executing each of the 970 movements involved, many repeated, some symmetrically and others not.

Their structures have evolved? Without any doubt that so it is, but only in its Founder’s hands.

What was done after his passed away was only the delirium of those who consider themselves more papist than the Pope, most of them being basically non-believers to summarize the elliptical of the sentence.

Students ’use of the body has also changed. Today, performances are far more artistic and controlled. The need to stand out in the numerous tournaments where patterns must be showcased has spurred these eloquent displays.

There has been endless discussion about the sports focus of the art and its limited martial orientation. This trend has significantly impacted the execution of movements, which, beyond a biomechanical variety encouraged by the lack of a single governing entity, are often performed with a marked lack of intention and power.

The obsession with fulfill the details imposed in the «seminars» dictated in this regard, has turned the execution totally dissociated from the true meaning of the movements. The performer only think in carry out the demanded details but not in the intention of it. In other words, the practitioner’s mind is focused on fulfilling details, not on the practical utility of the movement.

Among the many things that feed the structure of patterns (symbolism, history, diagram and its biomechanics) is the reason for each movement. The study of this detail allows us to relate with the intention that its creator gave to each and every one of the movements. Without this we are only executing a choreographic show, looking good but empty of content. The question to ask yourself is as follow: when I am executing a pattern am I doing it to satisfy the guru who gave the last seminar or I’m doing it to improve my effectiveness in self-defense?; because that is what it is about, self-defense or is this a thing of the past?

It is also curious that the leaders setting the new rules have overlooked the detail of starting from one point and returning to that same exact spot, as the rule and diagram specify. This important detail will lead them to corroborate whether the biomechanics is correct or not, because if it is not, be sure that you will not return to the starting point.  The patterns are one way among others to train movements for self-defense against several opponents, difficult to achieve in the sport free sparring that is designed only against one opponent and with a number of regulatory restrictions.

Studying patterns significantly improves body control and angles in executing attacks and blocks, both from the ground and in the air. It is understood that each and every one of the movements is designed to protect the practitioner’s physical integrity, so they must be performed with naturalness, free from rigidity, and with maximum power. Choreographed performances that lack this perspective merely feed the empty form, crafted solely to satisfy the standards of the judges at the next tournament.

SGM Ricardo Desimone   

to be aware read again the previous notes

A comment: The name Taekwondo and the techniques used in the 2024 Olympics have absolutely nothing in common with our art, which sounds the same but is written differently and serves other purposes and practical uses.

I want to emphasize what is happening today in the teaching of Taekwon-Do, how we are carrying out the transfer of knowledge, and what the result of today’s education will be. A seminar or an IIC is supposed to be very serious, special occasions for transferring details, unifying the criteria used, and acquiring the knowledge that the new generation of black belts does not yet have.

It does not take a high-degree Black Belt to train in combinations of kicks and punches that any instructor can teach. Do you think a high-degree Black Belt is necessary to ask people at a seminar for kicks and punches that are typically imaginary combinations, useful only for the one giving the order? Beyond this point, it is also important to note that it is not appropriate to give a general command for sports combinations when they cannot be used by all the people present. It would be like thinking that all students or practitioners are going to fight the same way—impossible.

Moreover, when a high-degree instructor teaches in this way, they are only showing what works for them or what they think works for them. General Choi Hong Hi never taught anything about the sports aspect. He always believed that it was not good to talk about this part in a seminar; he used to say it wasn’t the right place for it.

When general commands are given, or a combination is shown, no consideration is given to the people present: some are taller, others more robust, some are younger, others older, etc. Some techniques may work for

certain body types and be useless for others. Not all ages have the same possibilities. In summary, doing this shows a lack of teaching experience.

Perhaps, and only perhaps, it is a good method to improve the abilities of those seeking Taekwon-Do purely as a sport. To apply this method, it is necessary to understand that the use of sports combinations is only useful in that realm, against a single opponent, and under the restrictions imposed by competition rules. But a martial art is something else that requires a different way of thinking and training. General Choi’s Taekwon-Do is undoubtedly a martial art, one that delegates to direct instructors the various ways to train their students for the sports arena.

On one occasion, while accompanying the Founder of the art as a translator during a seminar in an Argentine city, one of the attendees (who was a good free-fight competitor) repeatedly asked about the sports aspect and how to stop an attacker in that type of fight if they were taller than him.

General Choi, tired of the same question, said that this wasn’t the right place to consider sports questions. However, due to the persistent inquiry, he made an exception: “OK, you’re taller than me, come attack me,” and with his hands behind his back, he moved slightly without excessive motion as the student attacked him. The General suddenly counterattacked by kicking the occasional opponent right at the belt knot.

Everyone began to applaud, surprising the student, who could not have imagined such a resolution. After this remarkable response, the Founder said: “No one can teach how to resolve such a moment. It’s personal. I saw the opportunity to counterattack, and I did so, but as a reflex, without thinking.”

In conclusion, no one can systematically teach how to defend others physically with pre-established combinations, because every person is different in structure and reflexes, as different as the circumstances. The key lesson from this anecdote is to avoid changing the purpose of meetings

or gatherings. The training ground is where students go daily to perfect their knowledge under the guidance of the Instructor.

A seminar or IIC is a special opportunity to learn and teach about the structure of the Art, its protocol, its pedagogical system, the biomechanics of its movements, and the understanding of its philosophical aspect (Do). But it is essential to clearly distinguish between martial art and the combat system typically used in the sports arena. Thank you for your time.

SGM Ricardo Desimone

To be aware read again the previous notes

Countless notes have been written and much has been theorized about the unique biomechanics designed by General Choi Hong Hi. There is usually great emphasis placed on hand positioning and postures to be assumed in the execution of the patterns he designed. In most cases, such emphasis on detail often results in performers executing movements in a stiffness way and lacking naturalness, thus without practical application of the movements they so meticulously developed.

Among the many factors typically conveyed in a seminar, there is always an omission considered minor detail: precisely returning to the starting point in the execution of the patterns. I have previously written about this omission, even in competitions. Judges are trained to observe and deduct from the overall score awarded to each competitor the deficiencies they detect in the execution of the pattern they choose and the one assigned to them. However, they are not trained to apply deductions for competitors who do not return precisely to their starting point.

Is this a minor detail and thus disregarded? Clearly, it is treated as such, but no, it is not a minor detail. A significant percentage of technical corrections made in foot and hand positions, correct facing, use of angles, and rotations are intimately linked to this seemingly minor detail. Have you tried to adhere to this detail? If you did it, you have likely discouragingly noticed how often you have to recognize your shortcomings. To my surprise some high-ranking black belts often ask me if all patterns begin and end in the same place or only some applies to this rule. When I confirm that all patterns indeed start and finish in the exact same place, it prompts them to review their practices, often without achieving satisfactory results.

I can still hear General Choi’s voice insisting on this matter and his emphatic «almost» when this was not fulfilled. If you stand on positions that do not meet the established parameters, your balance will be precarious, and the power in your hands will inevitably be diminished. This means that the strength and effectiveness of your hands largely depend on your feet. Do you feel unstable when rotating? Unless you have consumed alcohol before performing the pattern, some aspect of your feet positioning is likely not correctly executed for this to happen, especially after having performed that rotation many times.

When everybody tears their clothes proclaiming left and right that they teach General Choi Hong Hi’s Taekwon-Do and then walk in a different way than the one established by him, I wonder how they are going to develop and teach his Taekwon-Do if they walk differently than proposed.

When you teach a beginner to move sideways, do you teach them on which part of the foot should rotate, or do you let them do it as they see fit? In Saju Jirugui and Saju Maki, you must teach this detail, which includes learning and incorporating vertical and horizontal sinusoidal motion. If they learn it there, they will have learned it for all other patterns. If you overlook this important step in your teaching, you leave the development of the student’s movements, rotations, and stability to chance. If you want to be effective with your hands, review the use of your feet.

SGM Ricardo Desimone 

To be aware read again the previous notes

Diverse professions have allowed humans to evolve technologically, emotionally, and intellectually. Time has been the factor that enabled this evolution. In every learning system, the maturation of information is imperative; otherwise, it cannot be incorporated or applied—in other words, growth does not occur.

In the art we are discussing, this factor has been essential in establishing the grading scale, whether it is for beginners or colored belt ranks (Gups) or advanced students (Dan) or black belts. The issue is neither arbitrary nor whimsical; this means that a certain waiting period (of practice, not just calendars) is required for the advancement or evolution of Gups and years for the promotion of Dan ranks. Experience in the field corroborates the accuracy of the system because the difference is noticeable even within the same level; a new grade is different from that same grade but older. It might seem that both are the same; however, seeing them in action and facing the same obstacles, the way they resolve them confirms the value of seniority. This is true for both beginner grades (Gups) and advanced belt grades (Dan). The same applies to instructors; the parameters do not change. Understanding this process is imperative to avoid being devoured by impatience and knocking on the door of promotions prematurely. Nowadays, one doesn’t need to knock too hard because the economic needs of some quickly satisfy impatience. In this dark process, resulting from fragmentation, many values are inevitably lost, integrity among them.

It is known that Taekwon-Do is a psychophysical activity that must adhere to rules and protocols. When this is not considered, the imbalance is both psychic and physical. When we repeat a movement tirelessly, we seek to incorporate it into instinct, into reflexes, in other words, to be able to use it when defensive necessity arises. Those who do not follow the pre-established protocol rules and do not respect the timelines are doing the same thing, incorporating that way of proceeding as a reflex action.

The passage of time allows us to see that no matter how much we advance in the mad race to the top, we will always be in the place that the time invested grants us. The rest are administrative tricks to deceive and economically advantage others. No matter how many grades one achieves, they are useless if they did not follow the required process, as we will have the grade but not the capacity and experience it demands.

Are we prepared to accept the inexorable passage of time, the existential human evolution? Are we prepared to understand that evolutionarily we are born, grow, decline, and die?

What has been said relates to the intellect and the body, whose relationship is inversely proportional. When the body allows us to do things, our intellect accompanies it vehemently but without much knowledge. With time, when our intellect reasons what needs to be done, our body accompanies it as it can or sometimes not. The psychophysical process described has always been present in the activity of Taekwon-Do. Many great competitors know what I am talking about.

Maintaining physical decorum is an obligation. It is necessary to evaluate our athletic relevance in time so that time does not play tricks on us. Always remember that the great champion in all categories has always been Chronos. It is not advisable to think in an acrobatic way of self-defense because that means not having implicit what has been said.

Senior Grand Master Ricardo Desimone

To be aware read again the previous notes

In countless publications, many truths and lies have been said about the activity of Taekwon-Do, it history and development, especially after its Founder passed away.

What is said or described in notes published in different social Media details realities that readers approve, giving certainty to what is mentioned there, fundamentally because many of them have been contemporaries of those events. Attempts to distort published truths are our daily bread, however, and despite this, the truth is impossible to hide and the distortion has a short-lived.

It is evident that the writings are not a mere narrative but are addressed to the student, the Instructor and the Authorities. The former usually tends to doubt because the version they have, is sometimes consistent with what has been published and sometimes not.

The others (instructors and Authorities) are difficult to confuse with distortions because their relationship with the handling of art is more direct, ancient and daily, however, sometimes it happens.

There is a common factor in all cases that draws attention and imposes reflection on the matter, I mean not acting on what we have heard, read and found out. It is something like finding out that on the road you are traveling there is a well or abyss but you continue to advance along the same path while turning a deaf ear to the information received. The worst thing is that as they fall down the ravine they scream inconsolably and blaming others for the fate that has befallen them, without acknowledging the responsibility they have in what happened.

Information is valuable as long as you proceed accordingly, otherwise you don’t complain later.

Institutional diversity inevitably leads to produce different biomechanics, sports rules and administration, by the way, the unavoidable path to stylistic atomization. There are great gurus out there who have made amazing modifications, ignoring the literary information and videos of the founder himself. The curious thing is that people obey the absurd mandates without complaining.

About 10 years ago, it became fashionable to manufacture “caciques” (Indian chiefs) at an early age and without the council of Indians having appointed them. Some went out as Indians one night and the next day they returned as a cacique. The proceeds of certificates (feathers’ distribution) are normally done in obscure procedures that look for economical reasons only.

In a previous note I think I have mentioned something about it looking to put clear over dark that mean that all “caciques” (Indian chiefs) should publish their certificates from 4th Dan onwards to expel doubts. The times and ages between degrees have been pre-established since the beginning of activity in the world, however some Indians use a tuft of feathers when they should still use a single feather. Let’s play in the forest now that the wolf is gone, says a children’s story.

The General called the right procedure Integrity, are you in agree?

Does this have to do with atomization? Well, yes, it is the heart of the matter, otherwise how to unify if there is no rule to regulate the activity. In addition, there is a risk of working with the inverted pyramid where the base is smaller than the top, in other words we are under the risk to have more “caciques” than Indians.  They say that there is no worse deaf person than the one who doesn’t want to hear.  Thank you for your attention.

Senior Grand Master Ricardo Desimone

To be aware read again the previous notes

Circumstances and my handling of English language let me to be a mediator between the desire of those of us who were the majority of the Argentine Instructors and the Founder of the discipline.

The separation of the Korean Instructors (from the original Federation created by General Choi in South Korea in 1966 to distribute their art in the world) leaded to this fact.

The telephone call late at night in Buenos Aires, Argentina (early in the morning in Canada) in a non precise date of 1978, to inform him that the national Black Belts pioneers of that country had decided to continue supporting him unconditionally, allowed me to establish a very special relationship that would last until his death (June 2002).

By those times, the convulsed state of the art produced the inevitable arrival of other Korean Instructors (some sent by the General himself to assist him in his expansionist task) and others who considered it a propitious moment to make their August. The speeches were diverse and without precision and not coincident in the biomechanics of the movements. This fact was repeated in other countries, to such an extent that it forced General Choi himself to take the bull by the horns and personally dictate seminars around the world. A single speech and a single biomechanics for all with pedagogical clarity, allowed a global progress not seen until then.

I was his translator into Spanish of his condensed Encyclopedia (1995 version) and in all interview he gave (notes in martial arts’ magazines, television interviews, meetings with national authorities, etc.) and in more than 10 International Instructors’ seminars.  In none of these seminars was discussed any topic related to the sports facet, since he considered that these aspects should be dealt with by the body of masters and instructors of each country. He merely laid down the rules by which competition was to be governed. He emphasized the touch’s control due to the lethal result in all full contact of the art he had created and highlighted the necessity of granting points to defenses and blocks that would be considered effective if these produced imbalance in the attacker. On every occasion he could, he made it clear that what is used in the Olympic area has nothing in common with his creation and it’s only a usurped name, considering it a comic form of karate (a funny karate as he used to say).

He explained each movement in detail and repeated them tirelessly so the attendees of these seminars would fully understand the meaning and the biomechanics to be executed.  He insisted on the need to perform the movements relaxed and without stiffness so as not to detract from their naturalness.

This contrast with the dictates of some of the entities that claims to follow their legacy but making contracture as the paradigm to be sought, removing all naturalness and effectiveness from the movements.

The curious thing about this discursive dichotomy is the staunch insistence on achieving the opposite of what was dictated by the founder of the discipline. It is also curious because there are plenty of examples in his literature and in the videos that have been filmed in his seminars, demolishing what is erroneously proposed today. Of course, there are reasons for this.

I have met people who denied the Founder even when the General was alive. On one occasion a person who is a GM now, was able to tell me in response to my observation about the erroneous execution of a punch with the front fist made by a competitor in patterns (Tul):…»Well, the General hits rotating his fist at the end????? ..as saying that the General doesn’t always do the right thing and taking as good the competitor’s mistake”. What the competitor was doing, and which prompted my comment, was just the opposite of the General’s indications. On another occasion, the same person was able to answer a question from an attendee of one of his “classes”: «That execution is not the right one he said, adjusting the attendee movement (and when the questioner replied that was General Choi in self who had told him to do so»), he replied: «The General is no longer here and now you must to do what I say.»

Beyond being strictly true what has been described, this give us a little understanding of what is happening in the current atomization of the art we belong.

Excessive pride or arrogance is considered one of the seven capital sins and in our case it reminds me the stanza of a verse from a famous book that contains gaucho’s sayings: «the snake wiggles and shows off its dowry» (Sic)

The biomechanics in the movements of the art created by General Choi Hong HI is unique in the martial arts’ spectrum. The execution of this allows the human being to obtain the maximum power in all and every one of the techniques. In this regard, it can be said that there is only one possible interpretation that makes a single execution possible. The only person who knew how to convey that reality was General Choi, its creator, who in person and with his body in motion gave an example of what he intended to pass on.

He never made any reference to kicks and punches in sequences of sports uses because he considered it a lack of experience to talk about this subject in a seminar with characteristics and fundamentals for self-defense.

I can safely say that General Choi Hong Hi was his Encyclopedia in action in all its aspects. His seminars, like his literature, began with the basics and then progressively continued with the most advanced.

Every time I re-watch the videos of his seminars, I corroborate the enormous didactic difference with what is disseminated today. 

SGM Ricardo Desimone

To be aware read again the previous notes